News
Climate group accused of ‘judicial capture’ ran forum with judges

Climate Activists and Judges in Controversial Online Forum
Collaboration Between activists and judges sparks ‘judicial capture’ concerns.
What’s Happening?
Environmental advocates and state judges were part of an online forum discussing climate science and litigation, raising concerns about impartiality. Fox News Digital uncovered these communications, sparking debates on judicial ethics.
Where Is It Happening?
Nationwide, with participants from various states across the U.S.
When Did It Take Place?
The forum was active for several years but is now defunct.
How Is It Unfolding?
– Fox News Digital obtained messages from the forum, revealing discussions between activists and judges.
– The forum was organized by an environmental advocacy group, sharing climate information and litigation updates.
– Critics argue this collaboration could lead to ‘judicial capture’, where judges favor specific viewpoints.
– The forum’s existence has sparked debates on judicial impartiality and ethics.
Quick Breakdown
– Environmental advocates and state judges communicated in a now-defunct online forum.
– The forum shared climate science information and litigation updates.
– Concerns raised about judicial impartiality and ‘judicial capture’.
– Fox News Digital obtained messages from the forum, bringing the issue to light.
Key Takeaways
The revelation of a nationwide online forum involving environmental activists and judges has ignited a contentious debate on judicial impartiality. Critics argue that such collaborations could lead to ‘judicial capture’, where judges may be influenced to favor specific viewpoints. This controversy raises questions about the ethics of judges engaging in discussions with advocacy groups, potentially compromising their objectivity in climate-related litigation.
The forum was a valuable platform for judges to understand the complexities of climate science and the latest developments in litigation.
– Judge Patricia Ben civic, Retired
Final Thought
The discovery of this online forum has set the stage for a broader discussion on judicial ethics and the potential influence of advocacy groups. As climate litigation continues to rise, ensuring the impartiality of judges is crucial. This controversy underscores the need for transparency and strict ethical guidelines to maintain public trust in the judicial system. The debate will likely intensify as more information comes to light, with both supporters and critics voicing their opinions on the appropriateness of such collaborations.
-
GPUs2 weeks ago
Nvidia RTX 50 SUPER GPU rumors: everything we know so far
-
Entertainment2 weeks ago
‘Big Brother 27’ Contestant Rylie Jeffries Breaks Silence on Katherine Woodman Relationship
-
NASA1 week ago
NASA Makes Major Discovery Inside Mars
-
NASA1 week ago
NASA Peers Inside Mars And Discovers A Mysteriously Violent Martian Past
-
News1 week ago
5 Docker containers I use to manage my home like a pro
-
News1 week ago
IFA 2025: What to expect from the smart home
-
News1 week ago
“There’s a Frustration”: Chicago Sky Coach Voices True Feelings After Narrow Loss
-
News2 weeks ago
Mississippi declares public health emergency over rising infant deaths. Here’s what to know