DOJ Antitrust Head Blasts Big Law for Obstructive Tactics

**DOJ Antitrust Chief Accuses Big Law of Misconduct in Courtrooms**

What’s Happening?

The head of the U.S. Department of Justice’s antitrust division has publicly criticized Big Law firms for using obstructive tactics in court, suggesting these practices are impeding fair legal proceedings. The remarks highlight growing tension between the DOJ and some of the nation’s top law firms.

What’s Happening?

Jonathan Kanter, the DOJ’s top antitrust official, called out Big Law firms for promoting tactics that hurt antitrust cases. His comments follow recent judicial reprimands over aggressive litigation strategies, particularly from firms tied to prominent tech clients.

Where Is It Happening?

The issue is nationwide, as it involves court proceedings across multiple federal districts and is part of broader concerns about fairness in antitrust enforcement.

When Did It Take Place?

The criticism was made on Friday, as part of a broader discussion on legal ethics and antitrust litigation.

How Is It Unfolding?

– The DOJ’s antitrust chief publicly condemned Big Law firms for using abusive tactics in court.
– Recent cases saw judges reprimand firms for delays and obstructionist strategies.
– The focus is on firms representing major tech and corporate clients.
– The comments signal the DOJ’s intent to address perceived litigation abuses.

Quick Breakdown

– **Public Rebuke**: The DOJ’s antitrust chief criticized Big Law firms for courtroom misconduct.
– **Judicial Pushback**: Courts have recently scolded firms for delaying tactics in antitrust cases.
– **Tech Industry Focus**: Many of the affected firms represent large tech and corporate entities.
– **Ongoing Issue**: The remarks suggest broader scrutiny of legal strategies in antitrust disputes.

Key Takeaways

The DOJ’s criticism highlights a deepening rift between regulatory bodies and Big Law firms, particularly those working with major tech clients. The dispute raises concerns about fairness in antitrust enforcement, where aggressive litigation tactics could delay justice and favor corporate interests over public good. This could lead to stricter oversight of legal conduct in high-stakes antitrust cases, reshaping how firms approach such matters in the future.

The legal strategies being used aren’t just delays; they’re systematic attempts to weaken antitrust actions against powerful corporations.

– Sarah Johnson, Legal Ethics Professor

Final Thought

The DOJ’s strong stance against Big Law’s tactics signals a fiery debate over fairness in antitrust cases. If left unchecked, these strategies risk undermining the legal system’s integrity, leaving consumers and competitors at a disadvantage. The fallout could redefine how antitrust litigation is handled, forcing firms to adapt or face stricter enforcement.

Source & Credit: https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2025-08-29/doj-antitrust-head-blasts-big-law-for-obstructive-tactics