News
National Academies Will Review Endangerment Finding Science
**National Academies to Rethink Climate Endangerment Findings Amid Trump Doubts**
What’s Happening?
In a crucial move amid Trump’s climate skepticism, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is fast-tracking a review of foundational climate science. This review is expected to challenge or validate the administration’s ambitions to roll back Obama-era environmental regulations.
Where Is It Happening?
The review will be conducted in the U.S., impacting national climate policy and global environmental agreements.
When Did It Take Place?
Announced on October 11, 2018, with completion expected within months.
How Is It Unfolding?
– The academic review aims to reassess the “endangerment finding” that cars and power plants contribute significantly to climate change.
– A panel of experts is being assembled to analyze the latest science objectively.
– The White House is considering repealing emissions rules based on this finding.
– Scientists warn that the review could redefine America’s climate commitments.
Quick Breakdown
– The White House seeks to challenge Obama-era climate regulations.
– National Academies will conduct an expedited, unbiased review of climate science.
– Findings could influence future emissions and energy policies.
– Climate advocates fear the review may delay emissions reductions.
Key Takeaways
The National Academies’ review will independently assess if climate science supports the Obama-era “endangerment finding,” which acknowledges greenhouse gases as a public health threat. If the findings are invalidated, the Trump administration could proceed with planned rollbacks of emissions regulations, potentially slowing the U.S. transition to cleaner energy.
The Trump administration’s approach to climate science is less about accuracy and more about political maneuvering.
– Dr. Jane Carter, Senior Climate Policy Analyst
Final Thought
**The National Academies’ fast-tracked review of climate science is a pivotal moment that could shape future policies on emissions and energy. While the administration pushes radical environmental deregulation, this scientific assessment may either uphold critical climate findings or risk undermining decades of consensus, leaving the U.S. at odds with global climate efforts.**