Watch: Former Washington Post ‘Fact Checker’ Can Only Stammer When He’s Confronted About Paper’s Bias

**DC’s Fact-Checker Faces Tough Grilling on Bias Allegations**

What’s Happening?

A former Washington Post fact-checker struggled to defend his work amid accusations of media bias. Glenn Kessler, known for his “Fact Checker” column, faced unexpected scrutiny during a recent podcast interview, revealing his discomfort under tough questions.

Where Is It Happening?

The confrontational interview took place on Mark Halperin’s “What’s Next” podcast, adding to the ongoing debate about media impartiality in national politics.

When Did It Take Place?

The revealing interview aired on Thursday, sparking immediate reactions from both media critics and supporters of journalistic integrity.

How Is It Unfolding?

– Kessler found himself struggling to respond to bias allegations, stammering through key questions.
– The interview highlighted a perceived disconnect between his role and the expectations of fairness.
– Audience reactions leaned heavily toward surprise and skepticism, fueling further debate.
– Implications for the Washington Post’s credibility have become a focal point in media circles.

Quick Breakdown

– Glenn Kessler, former Washington Post “Fact Checker,” faced tough questions on a podcast.
– His responses indicated unpreparedness for criticism of his fact-checking methods.
– The exchange reignited discussions about media bias and accountability.
– The Washington Post’s reputation is under scrutiny following the incident.

Key Takeaways

Glenn Kessler’s podcast interview underscores the pressures faced by media figures who are often seen as arbiters of truth. His struggle to justify his work highlights the broader challenges in maintaining impartiality in journalism. As media bias continues to dominate public discourse, this incident serves as a reminder of the transparency needed to uphold trust in journalism.

In journalism, facts shouldn’t just be checked; they should be questioned by everyone, including those who deliver them.

– Mark Halperin, Podcast Host

Final Thought

Glenn Kessler’s stumbling defense on the podcast highlights a critical moment in media accountability. The incident underlines the necessity for transparency in journalism, where even fact-checkers must be ready to face scrutiny. The fallout will likely shape future discussions on bias and the role of media outlets in shaping public trust.

Source & Credit: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/08/watch-former-washington-post-fact-checker-can-stammer/